<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playoff bound?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/</link>
	<description>The inside scoop on Kansas high school sports.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Maybe they should put a qualifier in the district format that says IN ADDITION to winning your distric a team MUST have a winning record to advance to the Play-offs... That would allow the district format, which I think has its benifits, yet allow "at-large" winning teams to still compete in the play-offs.  This coupled with requiring only "same class" games to be counted for the "winning record" and a minimum number of those.... say 7....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they should put a qualifier in the district format that says IN ADDITION to winning your distric a team MUST have a winning record to advance to the Play-offs&#8230; That would allow the district format, which I think has its benifits, yet allow &#8220;at-large&#8221; winning teams to still compete in the play-offs.  This coupled with requiring only &#8220;same class&#8221; games to be counted for the &#8220;winning record&#8221; and a minimum number of those&#8230;. say 7&#8230;.
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=338" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>just did the math on the 8 Man thru 4A brackets...  28% of the 4A teams have a losing record... that is 9 of 32 (5@4-5, 3@3-6, 1@2-7)... how many teams in 4A had a winning record and did not make it I am not sure... but this is terrible.  In 2-1A there are 4 teams in the play-offs with a 2-7 record....Congrates to those that made the system work for them... and too bad a sensable system could not be used to reward those teams who played the season in their own class and won the majority of those games.  Something NEEDS to be done...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just did the math on the 8 Man thru 4A brackets&#8230;  28% of the 4A teams have a losing record&#8230; that is 9 of 32 (5@4-5, 3@3-6, 1@2-7)&#8230; how many teams in 4A had a winning record and did not make it I am not sure&#8230; but this is terrible.  In 2-1A there are 4 teams in the play-offs with a 2-7 record&#8230;.Congrates to those that made the system work for them&#8230; and too bad a sensable system could not be used to reward those teams who played the season in their own class and won the majority of those games.  Something NEEDS to be done&#8230;
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=337" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>ok, i see your point and i agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, i see your point and i agree.
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=333" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RikRok</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>RikRok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>But if you do that, nobody will schedule tough non-league games.

It's all about who is No. 1, and it's extremely rare in high school that when all is said and done that two of the best teams don't meet in the title game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you do that, nobody will schedule tough non-league games.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about who is No. 1, and it&#8217;s extremely rare in high school that when all is said and done that two of the best teams don&#8217;t meet in the title game.
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=266" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I think they should use a new system.  Make the whole season worth watching.  Not the last 3 games...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should use a new system.  Make the whole season worth watching.  Not the last 3 games&#8230;
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=220" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RikRok</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>RikRok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>With two teams moving on from each district, I can't see how people can complain.

I actually found the previous system more exciting, when just one team moved on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With two teams moving on from each district, I can&#8217;t see how people can complain.</p>
<p>I actually found the previous system more exciting, when just one team moved on.
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=218" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Steinle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>David Steinle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/blog/2007/10/24/playoff-bound/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Far from perfect? You're being mighty kind. Pathetic is a better word, but I can't really say how I feel on these boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far from perfect? You&#8217;re being mighty kind. Pathetic is a better word, but I can&#8217;t really say how I feel on these boards.
<p style="text-align:right;"><small><a href="http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=213" target="_blank">[REPORT A VIOLATION]</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
